COVID-19 vaccine-induced neutralising antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/5 are diminished in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on anti-TNF or JAK-inhibitor therapy

Background: Patients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving anti-TNF or JAK-inhibitor therapy have attenuated responses to COVID-19 vaccination. We aimed to determine how IBD treatments affect neutralising antibody responses against the currently dominant Omicron BA.4/5 variants. Method(s): We prospectively recruited 329 adults (68 healthy controls (HC) and 261 IBD) who had received three doses of COVID-19 vaccine at nine UK centres. The IBD population was established (>12 weeks therapy) on either thiopurine (n=60), infliximab (IFX) (n=43), thiopurine and IFX combination (n=46), ustekinumab (n=43), vedolizumab (n=46) or tofacitinib (n=23). Pseudoneutralisation assays were performed and the half maximal inhibitory concentration (NT50) of participant sera was calculated. The primary outcome was anti-SARSCoV-2 neutralising response against wild-type (WT) virus and the BA.4/5 variant after the second and third doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy, adjusting for prior infection, ethnicity, vaccine type and age. Result(s): Heterologous (two doses adenovirus vaccine, third dose mRNA vaccine) and homologous (three doses mRNA vaccine) vaccination strategies significantly increased neutralising titres against both WT SARS-CoV-2 virus and the BA.4/5 variants in HCs and IBD (fig 1). Antibody titres against BA.4/5 were significantly lower than antibodies against WT virus in both groups (Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) [95% CI], 0.11 [0.09, 0.15], P<0.0001 in healthy participants;GMR 0.07 [0.06, 0.08], P<0.0001 in IBD patients). Multivariable models showed that neutralising antibodies against BA.4/5 after three doses of vaccine were significantly lower in IBD patients on IFX (GMR 0.44 [0.20, 0.97], P=0.042), IFX and thiopurine combination (GMR 0.34 [0.15, 0.77], P=0.0098) or tofacitinib (GMR 0.37 [0.15, 0.92], P=0.032), but not in patients on thiopurine monotherapy, ustekinumab or vedolizumab. Breakthrough infection was associated with lower neutralising antibodies against WT and BA.4/5 (P<0.05). Conclusion(s): A third dose of COVID-19 vaccine based on the WT spike glycoprotein boosts neutralising antibody titres in patients with IBD. However, responses are lower against the currently dominant variant BA.4/5, particularly in patients taking anti-TNF or JAK-inhibitor therapy. Breakthrough infections are associated with lower neutralising antibodies and immunosuppressed IBD patients may receive additional benefit from bivalent vaccine boosters which target Omicron variants. .

COVID-19 VACCINATION RESPONSE IN IMMUNOSUPPRESSED PATIENTS WITH IBD IS ASSOCIATED WITH ALTERED GUT MICROBIOTA FUNCTION

Introduction Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF therapy exhibit attenuated humoral immune responses to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The gut microbiota and its functional metabolic output, which are perturbed in IBD, play an important role in shaping host immune responses. We explored whether the gut microbiota and metabolome could explain variation in anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses in immunosuppressed IBD patients. Methods Faecal and serum samples were prospectively collected from patients with IBD established on infliximab therapy (for >12 weeks) who were undergoing vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) immunoassays were used to measure antibody responses following two doses of either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 vaccine. Seroconversion was defined by a cut-off anti-S concentration of 15 U/ml, which correlated with 20% viral neutralization;anti-S antibody concentration of < 380 U/ml was indicative of poor response to vaccination. Patients with serological evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded from the analysis. Faecal calprotectin measurement, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and bile acid profiling with ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) were performed on faecal samples. Results Forty-five infliximab-treated patients were recruited (median age 40 [range 19-67];32 Crohn's disease, 13 ulcerative colitis;28 with concomitant immunomodulator therapy;six with prior infection). 14 patients (35%) had seroconverted after one dose of vaccine and 37 (95%) seroconverted after two doses. 18 patients (46%) had a poor response after two doses of vaccine. There was no association between faecal calprotectin and vaccine response (p=0.41). No differences between satisfactory and poor vaccine responders were noted in alpha or beta diversity of the gut microbiota. The faecal metabolome of satisfactory responders was enriched in the microbial metabolite trimethylamine (q=0.03). Trends were noted linking the short chain fatty acid butyrate with satisfactory response (P=0.01) and succinate with poor response (P=0.06). No significant differences in primary or secondary bile acids were found to associate with vaccine response. The butyrate-producing genus Roseburia was positively correlated with faecal butyrate abundance (q=0.03). Conclusions Our data suggest an association between gut microbiota function and variable serological response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients. Microbial metabolites including trimethylamine and butyrate may be important in mitigating anti-TNF-induced attenuation of the immune response.

POOR RESPONSE TO ANTI-SARS-COV-2 VACCINATION IN IMMUNOSUPPRESSED INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS IS ASSOCIATED WITH ALTERED GUT MICROBIOTA FUNCTION

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF therapy exhibit attenuated humoral immune responses to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The gut microbiota and its functional metabolic output, which are perturbed in IBD, play an important role in shaping host immune responses. We explored whether the gut microbiota and metabolome could explain variation in anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses in immunosuppressed IBD patients. Methods: Faecal and serum samples were prospectively collected from patients with IBD established on infliximab therapy (for >12 weeks) who were undergoing vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) immunoassays were used to measure antibody responses following two doses of either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 vaccine. Seroconversion was defined by a cut-off anti-S concentration of 15 U/ml, which correlated with 20% viral neutralization;anti-S antibody concentration of < 380 U/ml was indicative of poor response to vaccination. Patients with serological evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded from the analysis. Faecal calprotectin measurement, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and bile acid profiling with ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) were performed on faecal samples. Results: Forty-five infliximab-treated patients were recruited (median age 40 [range 19-67];32 Crohn's disease, 13 ulcerative colitis;28 with concomitant immunomodulator therapy;six with prior infection). 14 patients (35%) had seroconverted after one dose of vaccine and 37 (95%) seroconverted after two doses. 18 patients (46%) had a poor response after two doses of vaccine. There was no association between faecal calprotectin and vaccine response (p=0.41). No differences between satisfactory and poor vaccine responders were noted in alpha or beta diversity of the gut microbiota. The faecal metabolome of satisfactory responders was enriched in the microbial metabolite trimethylamine (q=0.03). Trends were noted linking the short chain fatty acid butyrate with satisfactory response (P=0.01) and succinate with poor response (P=0.06). No significant differences in primary or secondary bile acids were found to associate with vaccine response. The butyrate-producing genus Roseburia was positively correlated with faecal butyrate abundance (q=0.03). Conclusion: Our data suggest an association between gut microbiota function and variable serological response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients. Microbial metabolites including trimethylamine and butyrate may be important in mitigating anti-TNF-induced attenuation of the immune response.

COVID-19 VACCINE-INDUCED ANTIBODY RESPONSES ARE IMPAIRED IN IBD PATIENTS TREATED WITH INFLIXIMAB, USTEKINUMAB OR TOFACITINIB, BUT NOT THIOPURINES OR VEDOLIZUMAB

Background : Robust COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody (Ab) responses are important for protective anti-viral immunity. Data are urgently needed to determine whether vaccineinduced immunity is impacted by commonly used immunosuppressive drug regimens in IBD. Methods: We prospectively recruited 447 adults (90 healthy controls and 357 IBD) at nine UK centres. The IBD study population was established (>12 weeks therapy) on either thiopurine monotherapy (n=78), infliximab (IFX) monotherapy (n=61), thiopurine & IFX combination therapy (n=70), ustekinumab (uste) monotherapy (n=56), vedolizumab (vedo) monotherapy (n=62) or tofacitinib (tofa) monotherapy (n=30). Participants had two doses of either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccines. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1 RBD) Ab concentrations, measured using the Elecsys anti- SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) Ab assay, 53-92 days after second vaccine dose, in participants without prior infection, adjusted by age & vaccine type. Secondary outcomes included proportions failing to generate protective Ab responses (defined cut-off anti-S concentration 15 U/ml, which correlated with 20% viral neutralization). Results: Geometric mean S Ab concentrations (figure 1) were lower in patients treated with IFX (153U/ml;p<0.0001), IFX and thiopurine combination (109U/mL;p<0.0001), tofa (430U/ml;p<0.0001) and uste (561U/ml;p=0.013) compared to controls (1596U/ml). No differences in S Ab concentrations were found between controls and thiopurine monotherapy-treated patients (1020U/ml;p=0.62), nor between controls and vedo-treated patients (944U/ml;p=0.69). In multivariable modelling (figure 2), lower S Ab concentrations were independently associated with IFX (FC 0.10 [95% CI 0.07-0.14], p<0.0001), tofa (0.36 [95% CI 0.19-0.69], p=0.002) and uste (0.56 [95% CI 0.31-1.00], p=0.049), but not with thiopurine (0.77 [95% CI 0.54-1.11], p=0.17) or vedo (1.01 [95% CI 0.61-1.68], p=0.96). mRNA vaccines (3.67 [95% CI 2.72-4.96], p<0.0001) and older age (0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.91], p=0.0003) were independently associated with higher & lower S Ab concentrations respectively. Protective Ab responses were generated by all thiopurine monotherapy, vedo, tofa and healthy control participants, but not by 11% of patients on IFX monotherapy, 13% on thiopurine & IFX combination therapy and 4% on uste. Conclusions : COVID-19 vaccine-induced Ab responses are significantly reduced in patients treated with IFX, or tofa, and to a lesser extent with uste. No significant reduction was seen in vedo or thiopurine monotherapy-treated patients. Our data suggest that 3rd primary or booster vaccine doses for IBD patients might be tailored to an individual's immunosuppressive treatment. (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented)

COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses are impaired in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients treated with infliximab, ustekinumab or tofacitinib, but not thiopurines or vedolizumab

Background: Robust COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody (Ab) responses are important for protective anti-viral immunity. Data are urgently needed to determine whether vaccine-induced immunity is impacted by commonly used immunosuppressive drug regimens in IBD. Methods: We prospectively recruited 447 adults (90 healthy controls and 357 IBD) at nine UK centres. The IBD study population was established (>12 weeks therapy) on either thiopurine monotherapy (n=78), infliximab (IFX) monotherapy (n=61), thiopurine & IFX combination therapy (n=70), ustekinumab (uste) monotherapy (n=56), vedolizumab (vedo) monotherapy (n=62) or tofacitinib (tofa) monotherapy (n=30). Participants had two doses of either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccines. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1 RBD) Ab concentrations, measured using the Elecsys anti- SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) Ab assay, 53-92 days after second vaccine dose, in participants without prior infection, adjusted by age & vaccine type. Secondary outcomes included proportions failing to generate protective Ab responses (defined cut-off anti-S concentration 15 U/mL, which correlated with 20% viral neutralization). Results: Geometric mean S Ab concentrations (figure 1) were lower in patients treated with IFX (153U/mL;p<0.0001), IFX and thiopurine combination (109U/mL;p<0.0001), tofa (430U/mL;p<0.0001) and uste (561U/mL;p=0.013) compared to controls (1596U/ml). No differences in S Ab concentrations were found between controls and thiopurine monotherapy- treated patients (1020U/mL;p=0.62), nor between controls and vedo-treated patients (944 U/mL;p=0.69). In multivariable modelling (figure 2), lower S Ab concentrations were independently associated with IFX (FC 0.10 [95% CI 0.07-0.14], p<0.0001), tofa (0.36 [95% CI 0.19-0.69], p=0.002) and uste (0.56 [95% CI 0.31-1.00], p=0.049), but not with thiopurine (0.77 [95% CI 0.54-1.11], p=0.17) or vedo (1.01 [95% CI 0.61-1.68], p=0.96). mRNA vaccines (3.67 [95% CI 2.72- 4.96], p<0.0001) and older age (0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.91], p=0.0003) were independently associated with higher & lower S Ab concentrations respectively. Protective Ab responses were generated by all thiopurine monotherapy, vedo, tofa and healthy control participants, but not by 11% of patients on IFX monotherapy, 13% on thiopurine & IFX combination therapy and 4% on uste. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine-induced Ab responses are significantly reduced in patients treated with IFX, or tofa, and to a lesser extent with uste. No significant reduction was seen in vedo or thiopurine monotherapy-treated patients. Our data suggest that 3rd primary or booster vaccine doses for IBD patients might be tailored to an individual's immunosuppressive treatment.